Tonja Jacobi on Muck Rack

Tonja Jacobi

  • Law Professor, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
United States
As seen in: The New York Times, Post Outlook, The Washington Post, USA Today, Wiley Online Library, Cambridge University Press & Assessment, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Tribune Opinion, Harvard Business Review, The Minnesota Star Tribune and
Law Professor at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, spends a lot of time thinking about SCOTUS
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Tonja

Contact Tonja, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Ideology and Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia

|
By Pat FlanaganNeil Leslie, Tonja Jacobi, Zoe Robinson
| Wiley Online Library Verified
In the United States, extensive research has examined how the Supreme Court's certiorari process allows justices to select cases that reflect their ideological leanings (Perry Jr. 1991; Epstein et al. 2007). All nine justices vote on certiorari but the “Rule of Four” requires only four justices to agree to grant certiorari, providing a strategic mechanism for minority blocs to influence the docket (Lax 2003; Caldeira et al.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Comparative Exceptionalism?: Strategy and Ideology in the High Court of Australia

|
By Tonja Jacobi
| Dialnet - Universidad de La Rioja
IdiomacatalàDeutschEnglishespañoleuskarafrançaisgalegoitalianoportuguêsromână
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (696) Issue with article?

Opinion: In ruling for Trump, the Supreme Court applied special rules

|
By Tonja Jacobi
| The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Verified
The peaceful transfer of power is the defining feature of democracy. All our nation’s leaders since 1776, whatever their ideology or resentments, have respected it. The Supreme Court was asked in Trump v. Anderson to address whether a man who has defied this democratic norm is eligible to lead the country again. The Constitution makes clear that he is not.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 81 licensed articles (83 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified