Skip To Main Content
Vincent Barredo on Muck Rack

Vincent Barredo

As seen in: JD Supra, Mondaq, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Vincent

Contact Vincent, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Davis Polk securities litigation victory for IREN earns AmLaw “Litigator of the Week” shout out

|
By Edmund Polubinski, Vincent Barredo, Mari Grace
| Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Davis Polk partners Edmund Polubinski and Mari Grace, counsel Vincent Barredo and David Toscano and associates Paulina Perlin and Nerenda Atako received a shout-out in AmLaw Litigation Daily’s “Litigator of the Week” column for securing the dismissal with prejudice of a putative securities class action against Bitcoin miner IREN Limited in the District of New Jersey.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Ninth Circuit Says Improper Drug Marketing Slogan Does Not Suffice To Plead Exchange Act Claim

|
By Neal A Potischman, Vincent Barredo, Brian Weinstein, Edmund Polubinski
| Mondaq
On August 20, 2025, a Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal of a putative securities class action against a pharmaceutical company.It found that while the Food and Drug Administration concluded that the company's marketing was not fair and balanced, the improper marketing did not suffice to establish either falsity or scienter for a federal securities claim. In March 2019, pharmaceutical manufacturer Talphera, Inc.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Ninth Circuit Rejects Securities Fraud Claim Involving Ambiguous Tech Lingo

|
By Bitfinex Hack, Brian M. Burnovski, Neal A Potischman, Vincent Barredo
| Mondaq
On November 19, 2024, a Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal of a securities fraud action alleging that Cloudera and its officers made false and misleading statements regarding the technical capabilities of Cloudera's products. The panel found that because the plaintiff failed to plead facts establishing what "cloud-native" and "cloud architecture" meant—and that the terms have no plain meaning—the plaintiff could not plead that statements about those topics were false or misleading.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 8 articles