Skip To Main Content
Yinfeng Hu on Muck Rack

Yinfeng Hu

As seen in: Wiley Online Library, PeerJ
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Yinfeng

Contact Yinfeng, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with systemic sclerosis

|
By Yinfeng Hu, Wenjie Zhong, Naomi Reay, ISPOR Task Force
| PeerJ
The study shows that the quality of life questionnaire for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the quality of life. The localized version of the questionnaire has strong psychometric properties, including high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good content and construct validity. These results align with those of the original questionnaire.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Best Evidence Summary for the Prevention of Pressure Injuries in Orthopaedic Patients

|
By Liqiong Zhou, Yinfeng Hu, Dan Ma, Bowen Ren
| Wiley Online Library Verified
Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Valence‐Dependent Implicit Action Generalization Among Group Members

|
By Zikai Xu, Jiecheng Huangliang, Yinfeng Hu, Xutao Zheng
| Wiley Online Library Verified
Supporting Information Filename Description cogs13440-sup-0001-SuppMat.docx41.2 KB Supporting Information References , , , , , , , , , , , , & (2020). Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 56–68. , , & (2017a). The “common good” phenomenon: Why similarities are positive and differences are negative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(4), 512–528. , , & (2017b). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 3 articles