Andreas Fulda on Muck Rack

Andreas Fulda

United Kingdom
As seen in: The Independent (UK), Memory Studies, Der Tagesspiegel, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Taylor & Francis Online, The Conversation, Foreign Policy Magazine, Rappler, univie.ac.at, The i Paper and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Andreas

Contact Andreas, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

„Sollte Taiwan fallen, war es das mit unserem Wohlstand“

|
By Andreas Fulda
| Focus+
Der chinesische Außenminister Wang Yi ist ein gefragter Mann. Bei der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz (MSC) im Februar 2026 bot ihm MSC-Chef Wolfgang Ischinger die große Bühne. Wangs Botschaft an die Europäer? „China und die EU sind Partner, keine systemischen Rivalen oder Gegner.“ Wang Yi ist aber auch ein Mann mit zwei Gesichtern.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Germany Cannot Engage China and Taiwan à la Carte

|
By Andreas Fulda
| CommonWealth Magazine
Gunter Schubert's recent op-ed for CommonWealth Magazine advocates a 'principled pragmatism’ in Germany’s engagement with China and Taiwan — one that unravels the moment you examine its core assumptions. The problem lies in what drives the argument from the outset. Schubert frames the US, China, and Russia as similar 'competing novel empires'. This false equivalence shouldn't be accepted as fact.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Why the China “hawk-dove” framing is an own goal; “autocracy competence” points the way

|
By Andreas Fulda
| ceias.eu
There is no intellectual justification for the West’s obsession with labeling China experts as “hawks” or “doves.” Rooted in Cold War binaries, it prevents viable policy and mirrors the very friend-enemy dichotomy liberal democracies claim to reject. An alternative framework—“autocracy competence”—combines the desire for cooperation with an awareness of systemic autocratic limitations. Key takeaways: Drop the hawk and dove labels.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 41 licensed articles (45 Total)

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Andreas

Contact Andreas, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified