Skip To Main Content
Daniel P. Sulmasy on Muck Rack

Daniel P. Sulmasy

Washington, D.C.
As seen in: Color Research & Application, Wiley Online Library, New York Daily News, JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association), JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, The New England Journal of Medicine, American Medical Association (AMA), Annals of Internal Medicine, Washingtonian, Neurology Journal
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Daniel P.

Contact Daniel P., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Reply to: In Reference to: The Role of the Physician in Caring for Patients Pursuing VSED: Challenging the Conventional Approach

|
By Benjamin W. Frush, Farr A. Curlin, Daniel P. Sulmasy
| Wiley Online Library Verified
We appreciate the question raised by Carroll and Shaw regarding the idea that “a physician who regards VSED as ethically wrong can nonetheless care for patients who choose it” [1]. We maintain (as Carroll and Shaw note) that there is opportunity for continued clinical care and ongoing dialogue between the patient pursuing VSED and the physician caring for them who views VSED as unethical.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

The Role of the Physician in Caring for Patients Pursuing VSED: Challenging the Conventional Approach

|
By Benjamin W. Frush, Farr A. Curlin, Daniel P. Sulmasy, I. R. Byock
| Wiley Online Library Verified
Key points ○ The conventional approach to voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) assumes physicians may set aside ethical disagreement in communication and clinical decision-making, which neglects the ethical problem of complicity. ○ The alternative approach to VSED, for those who view VSED as ethically wrong, allows clinicians to advise against VSED and to provide palliative medicine while resisting interventions that facilitate VSED. Why does this paper matter?
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

The Ethics of Heart Donation After the Circulatory Determination of Death: Gaps in Knowledge and Research Opportunities

|
By David Rodríguez-Arias, Kathleen Fenton, James L. Bernat, Daniel P. Sulmasy
| Wiley Online Library Verified
Conflicts of Interest Drs Dalle Ave and Sulmasy report a grant from the Mc Donald Agape Foundation during the conduct of the study. References 1, , , et al., “Outcome After Heart Transplantation From Donation After Circulatory-Determined Death Donors,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 36, no. 12 (2017): 1311–1318.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 23 articles