Edward Lanquist on Muck Rack

Edward Lanquist

Nashville
As seen in: JD Supra, Reuters, Daily Report (Georgia), Law.com, Legaltech News, Bloomberg Law, Law360, Bloomberg Tax, Westlaw Today, CPO Magazine, Daily Journal (Los Angeles and San Francisco) and
Shareholder at Baker Donelson, father of two, and community volunteer. @EdwardLanquist Instagram eds.whiskey.shelf
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Edward

Contact Edward, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

The Invisible Insider: How AI Agents Enable Undetectable Trade Secret Theft – and What Companies Must Do Now

|
By Edward Lanquist, Clinton Sanko
| JD Supra
AI agents can harvest, synthesize, and exfiltrate trade secrets through more than a dozen evasion techniques that generate no conventional security alert. Employees can photograph AI-generated screen displays with personal devices, bypassing every layer of digital monitoring entirely. Companies must act now: update AI acceptable-use policies, mandate prompt logging, restrict personal devices in sensitive work areas, and build AI review into departure protocols.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

A Legal Framework for the Discoverability of AI

|
By Edward Lanquist, Nicole Imhof, Andrew Droke
| Daily Report (Georgia) Verified
Nicole Imhof (from left), Andrew J. Droke and Edward D. Lanquist of Baker Donelson. Courtesy photos A growing body of case law is beginning to define when artificial intelligence (AI)-generated materials may be protected and when they will not. In addition to United States v. Heppner, three cases decided before and alongside Heppner—Tremblay v. OpenAI Inc., Warner v. Gilbarco and In re OpenAI Inc.—illuminate the key variables that courts are examining.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Copyright Law in 2025: Courts begin to draw lines around AI training, piracy, and market harm

|
By Edward Lanquist, Baker Donelson
| Westlaw Today Verified
(March 16, 2026) - Edward D. Lanquist and Benjamin West Janke of Baker Donelson examine 2025 copyright decisions addressing AI training and fair use, highlighting judicial concerns over piracy and market harm.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 41 licensed articles (42 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified