Skip to main content
Jan Engelmann on Muck Rack

Jan Engelmann

Amsterdam
As seen in: Nature, Wiley Online Library, PLOS, Psychology Today, Frontiers, PNAS, SAGE Publishing, Science Magazine, BioRxiv, Cell Press and
Amsterdam NeuroEconomics Lab @UvA_Amsterdam; interested in how emotions influence decision-making; Professor of Neuroeconomics at Amsterdam School of Economics
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Jan

Contact Jan, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition

|
By Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, Sonja J. Ebel van Wijk, Carin Molenaar, Akzira Abuova, Lizbeth Mujica-Manrique, Sarah M. Leisterer-Peoples, Bret A. Beheim, Luke Maurits, Anna Albiach-Serrano, Matthias Allritz, Nazli Altınok, Federica Amici, Alice MI Auersperg, Filippo Aureli, Elisa Bandini, Jochen Barth, Leïla Benziad, Bettina E. Bläsing, Manuel Bohn, Marie Bourjade, Juliane Brauer, Marie-Hélène Broihanne, Sarah F. Brosnan, Nereida Bueno-Guerra, Thomas Bugnyar, David Buttelmann, Frances Buttelmann, Trix Cacchione, Malinda Carpenter, Fernando M. Runzer Colmenares, Catherine Crockford, Katherine A. Cronin, África de las Heras, Arianna De Marco, Sarah E. DeTroy, Valérie L. Dufour, Shona Duguid, Robin Dunbar, Johanna Eckert, Jan Engelmann, Joël Fagot, Julia Fischer, Martina Funk, György Gergely, Julia Greenberg, Johannes Großmann, Sebastian Grüneisen, Marta Halina, Daniel Hanus, Sarah R. Heilbronner, Christophe Heintz, Robert Hepach, Esther Herrmann, Satoshi Hirata, Alenka Hribar, Gabriele Janzen, Juliane Kaminski, Patricia Kanngiesser, Fumihiro Kano, Katharina C. Kirchhofer, Hagen Knofe, Kathrin S. Kopp, Christopher Krupenye, Isabelle Laumer, Stephen C. Levinson, Ulf Liszkowski, Héctor M. Manrique, Gema Martin-Ordas, Emma McEwen, Richard Moore Verified, Enric Munar, Marcos Nadal, Christian Nawroth, Suska Nolte, Marie Pelé, Patrizia Potì, Hannes Rakoczy, Julia Riedel, Amelie Romain, Federico Rossano, Yvan I. Russell, Gloria Sabbatini, Marie Schäfer, Marina Scheumann, Martin Schmelz, Benjamin Schmid, Vanesa Schmitt, Carla Sebastián-Enesco, Amanda Madeleine Seed, Chikako Suda-King, Tibor Tauzin, Sebastian Tempelmann, Claudio Tennie, Valentina Truppa, Jana Uher, Amrisha Vaish, Edwin van Leeuwen, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Christoph Völter, Victoria Vonau, Claudia Wascher, Roman M. Wittig, Wouter Wolf, Michael Tomasello, Katja Liebal, Josep Call, Daniel Haun
| Nature Verified
Abstract The study of great ape cognition offers insights into the evolutionary origins of human intelligence, but is hindered by small sample sizes and restricted access to data. To address this, we present the EVApeCognition Dataset, a publicly available resource comprising 262 experimental datasets from 150 scientific publications from the Wolfgang Köhler Primate Research Center (2004–2021) in Leipzig, Germany.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Children’s resource taking varies with experimentally manipulated relative status - Scientific Reports

|
By Oded Ritov, Jan Engelmann, Avi Benozio, Chana Berelejis
| Nature Verified
Abstract How do relative status and gender shape children’s resource taking? In two preregistered studies, 4–8-year-olds completed a competitive ‘Where’s Waldo?’ task and then decided how many tokens to take from a new peer. In Study 1 (N = 195; 49% girls), children competed against a pre-recorded peer and were randomly assigned to win or lose. Next, they chose one of two unfamiliar peers (a prior “winner” or “loser”) and selected how many tokens to take from that chosen peer.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Chimpanzees rationally revise their beliefs

|
By Eliyahu M. Farber, Hanna Schleihauf, Peng Tan, Emily Sanford, Bill Thompson, Snow Zhang, Joshua Rukundo, Josep Call, Esther Herrmann, Jan Engelmann
| Science Magazine Verified
Editor’s summary The ability of humans to think rationally and weigh the evidence when making a choice is well known. Such decision making requires a metacognitive process in which an individual can evaluate an overall set of evidence and make the best supported choice. Whether other animals can also do this has been unknown. Schleihauf et al.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 34 articles