Skip to main content
Rachel Simons on Muck Rack

Rachel Simons

As seen in: Medium, Good Food, The Age, Epicurious, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Brisbane Times, JD Supra, WAtoday, Mondaq, Cleveland Jewish News and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Rachel

Contact Rachel, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

California Courts Of Appeal Split On State Law Standing Requirement For Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Violations

|
By Rod Fliegel, Rachel Simons
| Mondaq
Rod M. Fliegel’s articles from Littler Mendelson are most popular: with Senior Company Executives and HR with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Insurance and Healthcare industries On June 4, 2026, California’s First District Court of Appeal held that the state’s law on “standing” requires no “concrete” injury to pursue federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claims in state court. The court’s opinion in Askins v.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California Courts of Appeal Split on State Law Standing Requirement for Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Violations | JD Supra

|
By Rachel Simons
| JD Supra
On June 4, 2026, California's First District Court of Appeal held that the state's law on "standing" requires no "concrete" injury to pursue federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claims in state court. The court's opinion in Askins v. CRST Expedited reflects stark differences between federal and state standing requirements and deepens the split of authority in the California Courts of Appeal.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California Courts of Appeal Split on State Law Standing Requirement for Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Violations

|
By Rod Fliegel, Rachel Simons
| Littler
On June 4, 2026, California’s First District Court of Appeal held that the state’s law on “standing” requires no “concrete” injury to pursue federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claims in state court. The court’s opinion in Askins v. CRST Expedited reflects stark differences between federal and state standing requirements and deepens the split of authority in the California Courts of Appeal.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 18 licensed articles (23 Total)