Skip To Main Content
Sarka Lisonkova on Muck Rack

Sarka Lisonkova

As seen in: Color Research & Application, Wiley Online Library, PLOS Medicine, MDPI, JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association), Pediatrics, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Healio Cardiac/Vascular Intervention, The Journal of Pediatrics, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Sarka

Contact Sarka, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology - Wiley Online Library

|
By Yasser Sabr, Gynaecology Children's, Sarka Lisonkova, Amélie Boutin
| Wiley Online Library Verified
To improve your experience, we (and our partners) store and/or access information on your terminal (cookie or equivalent) with your consent for all our websites and applications, on your connected terminals.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (695) Issue with article?

On Assumptions, Outcomes, and the Limits of the Birth‐Based Perspective

|
By Sarka Lisonkova, Amélie Boutin
| Wiley Online Library Verified
In this issue of Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, Bruckner and colleagues [1] present an innovative hypothesis that seeks to explain the non-Hispanic Black survival advantage in comparison with non-Hispanic White infants among periviable births, invoking left truncation resulting from vanishing twin syndrome [1].
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Maternal Mortality in the United States: The Need for Accurate Surveillance

|
By K. S. Joseph, Sarka Lisonkova, Amélie Boutin, Giulia M. Muraca
| Wiley Online Library Verified
In 2010, Richard Horton, the Editor of the Lancet, published an editorial discussing the conflict between science and advocacy groups on issues related to maternal mortality [1]. The context for his comments was a study by Hogan et al. [2] showing that global maternal deaths (estimated to be as high as 535,900 in 2005) had decreased from 526,300 in 1980 to 342,900 in 2008. According to Horton. ‘…there needs to be serious reflection among the global health community about how it responds to new data.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 26 licensed articles (27 Total)