Tom Ravlic on Muck Rack

Tom Ravlic

Verified
Melbourne
As seen in: MSN Australia, Substack, Sydney Morning Herald, Brisbane Times, EIN News, WAtoday, Crikey, SmartCompany (Australia), The Saturday Paper, The Spectator Australia and
Journalist. Author. Podcast host, Critical Line Item. Contributor, The Mandarin. News tips: onthegrapevine@pm.me
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Tom

Contact Tom, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Imagination lacking in Treasury options paper

|
By Tom Ravlic Verified
| Substack
Photo by Nasser Eledroos on Unsplash The first thing that must be said about the options paper released last week by Federal Treasury on regulation of accounting, auditing and consulting firms is that it is mercifully short. It’s brevity meant I did not fall asleep as a consequence because, quite frankly, it was boring, unimaginative, and it has the underlying assumption that the existing institutions just needed to have functions added to them to assist with better regulation of auditors.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Do firms really face structural separation?

|
By Tom Ravlic Verified
| Substack
Photo by Iñaki del Olmo on Unsplash Options papers are curious things because the worst possible options will be chosen as the headline. In the case of the latest deep dive into accounting and audit regulation the media has picked up on the notion of firms being told to split up because some of them - or people within them - have behaved inappropriately. Let’s not pump up the possibility of separation of firms in amy way shape or form just yet because this is an options paper and not an edict.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Farrell unveils terms for parliamentary support system review

|
By Tom Ravlic Verified
| The Mandarin Verified
Special Minister of State Don Farrell has released the terms of reference for the independent review of the parliamentary support system announced in April. The review will examine the systems that support parliamentarians’ staff and others working across the parliamentary precinct. It will include statutory reviews of the Parliamentary Business Resources Act 2017, the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service Act 2023, and the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 1,722 licensed articles (1,726 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified