Anthony Michael Kreis
As seen in:
MSN,
The New York Times,
Yahoo Life,
Yahoo News,
Chicago Tribune,
Digg,
Rolling Stone,
SFGate,
Slate,
The Contrarian
and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Anthony Michael Kreis
Clause Essentialism and the Third Reconstruction
Ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Clause Essentialism and the Third Reconstruction Autores: Anthony Michael Kreis Localización: Constitutional commentary, ISSN 0742-7115, Vol. 38, Nº. 1 (Spring), 2023, págs. 117-127 Idioma: inglés Es reseña de: Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process James E. Fleming Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2022 Enlaces Texto completo
We rejected kingly power once. We must do so again.
By Anthony Michael Kreis America has a constitutional crisis. The president of the United States is laying siege to the constitutional order.
I'm a Georgia Law Professor. The YSL Trial Was a ‘Drain on Everybody's Resources'
Continue reading More for You
I'm a Georgia Law Professor. The YSL Trial Was a 'Drain on Everybody's Resources' Original
December 4, 2024 Rapper Young Thug, real name Jeffery Williams, appears in court for jury selection at Fulton County courthouse in Atlanta on Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2022. Natrice Miller/Atlanta Journal-Constitution/AP Professor Anthony Michael Kreis teaches constitutional law at Georgia State University and authored the book Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development.
Opinion | The man behind the curtain of these SCOTUS rulings isn't Trump. It's Reagan. Original
Since the Reagan Revolution of the 1980s, conservatives have played a long game to capture the federal courts and undo the liberal constitutional order championed by the New Deal coalition. The Supreme Court demonstrated throughout its recently concluded term that it is working earnestly to bury the New Deal’s legacy once and for all.
Using Appellate Decisions and Algorithms to Advance Judicial Transparency
A new report analyzes New York appellate decisions decreasing sentences in order to identify judges that frequently hand down unduly harsh punishments. In the heart of a vibrant democracy lies the imperative for transparency and accountability, most crucially within the judiciary. Traditionally shrouded in legalese and procedural intricacies, the inner workings of our courts often remain opaque to the public eye.
How Dismissed Claims in Georgia Trump Case Could Be Resurrected
Last week, a Georgia judge dismissed six charges against Donald Trump and his codefendants in their criminal prosecution for election interference, while leaving the rest of the case intact. The dismissed charges alleged that the defendants solicited state officials to violate their oaths of office, but the court found that the indictment lacked specificity.
Judge Nixes Some Of Georgia's Charges Against Trump And His Allies — But That Won’t Necessarily Derail The Case | Digg
By Anthony Michael Kreis, Georgia State University A Fulton County judge has tossed out six of the 41 state charges against Donald Trump and his allies in Georgia’s expansive election interference case against the former president and others. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a ruling on March 13, 2024, that focused on charges related to allegations that Trump and other defendants tried to get state officials to break the law and decertify the 2020 election results.
The Lawfare Podcast: Six Counts Quashed in the Fulton County Case
Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With On March 13, Judge McAfee released an order quashing six counts in the Fulton County electoral interference indictment against former President Trump and his numerous co-defendants. These charges were related to alleged solicitation of violations of oath of office, and Judge McAfee quashed the charges due to insufficient evidence.
COMMENTARY: Nixed Trump charge won't derail case
A Fulton County judge has tossed out six of the 41 state charges against Donald Trump and his allies in Georgia’s expansive election interference case against the former president and others. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a ruling Wednesday that focused on charges related to allegations that Trump and other defendants tried to get state officials to break the law and decertify the 2020 election results. kAm%96 CF=:?8 5@6D?’E >62?
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
© 2024 Tolerance.ca ® Inc. All reproduction rights reserved. All information reproduced on the Web pages of www.tolerance.ca (including articles, images, photographs, and logos) is protected by intellectual property rights owned by Tolerance.ca ® Inc. or, in certain cases, by its author. Any reproduction of the information for use other than personal use is prohibited.
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
A Fulton County judge has tossed out six of the 41 state charges against Donald Trump and his allies in Georgia’s expansive election interference case against the former president and others. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a ruling on March 13, 2024, that focused on charges related to allegations that Trump and other defendants tried to get state officials to break the law and decertify the 2020 election results.
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a ruling on March 13, 2024, that focused on charges related to allegations that Trump and other defendants tried to get state officials to break the law and decertify the 2020 election results. The ruling doesn’t mean that the entire case is derailed, explains Georgia election and legal scholar Anthony Michael Kreis. It’s a focused and technical ruling that says Georgia District Attorney Fani T.
Lawfare Live: Discussing the Dismissal of 6 Counts in the Fulton County Indictment
Benjamin Wittes is editor in chief of Lawfare and a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. He is the author of several books. Anna Bower is Lawfare’s Legal Fellow and Courts Correspondent. Anna holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Cambridge and a Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law School. She joined Lawfare as a recipient of Harvard’s Sumner M. Redstone Fellowship in Public Service.
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p uF=E@? r@F?EJ ;F586 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^Db]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^accfghgg^ECF>A0DA64:2=56>FCC6CD0b`bac]A57Qm92D E@DD65 @FE D:I @7 E96 c` DE2E6 492C86Dk^2m 282:?DE s@?2=5 %CF>A 2?5 9:D 2==:6D :? v6@C8:2’D 6IA2?D:G6 6=64E:@? :?E6C76C6?46 42D6 282:?DE E96 7@C>6C AC6D:56?E 2?5 @E96CD]k^Am kAmuF=E@? r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE yF586 $4@EE |4p766 :DDF65 2 CF=:?8 @?
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p uF=E@? r@F?EJ ;F586 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^Db]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^accfghgg^ECF>A0DA64:2=56>FCC6CD0b`bac]A57Qm92D E@DD65 @FE D:I @7 E96 c` DE2E6 492C86Dk^2m 282:?DE s@?2=5 %CF>A 2?5 9:D 2==:6D :? v6@C8:2’D 6IA2?D:G6 6=64E:@? :?E6C76C6?46 42D6 282:?DE E96 7@C>6C AC6D:56?E 2?5 @E96CD]k^Am kAmuF=E@? r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE yF586 $4@EE |4p766 :DDF65 2 CF=:?8 @?
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p uF=E@? r@F?EJ ;F586 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^Db]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^accfghgg^ECF>A0DA64:2=56>FCC6CD0b`bac]A57Qm92D E@DD65 @FE D:I @7 E96 c` DE2E6 492C86Dk^2m 282:?DE s@?2=5 %CF>A 2?5 9:D 2==:6D :? v6@C8:2’D 6IA2?D:G6 6=64E:@? :?E6C76C6?46 42D6 282:?DE E96 7@C>6C AC6D:56?E 2?5 @E96CD]k^Am kAmuF=E@? r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE yF586 $4@EE |4p766 :DDF65 2 CF=:?8 @?
Judge nixes some of Georgia’s charges against Trump and his allies − but that won’t necessarily derail the case
AP Photo/Steve Helber A Fulton County judge has tossed out six of the 41 state charges against Donald Trump and his allies in Georgia’s expansive election interference case against the former president and others. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a ruling on March 13, 2024, that focused on charges related to allegations that Trump and other defendants tried to get state officials to break the law and decertify the 2020 election results.
Case against Fani Willis offers far more drama than convincing evidence
The conflict-of-interest allegations against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in the election-interference case against Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants have always been thin on evidence but never short on drama. Judge Scott McAfee has scheduled another hearing for Friday to determine if the messy affair has cast a dark enough cloud over the entire prosecution to warrant removing Willis and her entire office.
The Lawfare Podcast, Trump’s Trials and Tribulations: Removal, Not to Federal Court but From the Colorado Ballot
Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With It's another episode of “Trump's Trials and Tribulations,” this one recorded on December 21 in front of a live audience on YouTube and Zoom. This week, Lawfare Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes sat down with Lawfare Legal Fellow Anna Bower and special guest Anthony Michael Kreis from the Georgia State University College of Law.
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
By Anthony Michael Kreis Georgia State University The Rev. Al Sharpton, foreground third from right, holds a banner with Martin Luther King, III, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, second from right, and Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, right, and others, during the march to call for sweeping protections against a further erosion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Saturday, Aug. 28, 2021, in Washington.
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
By Anthony Michael Kreis Georgia State University (THE CONVERSATION) — A federal appeals court in Arkansas ruled on Monday, Nov. 20, 2023, that only the federal government – not private citizens or civil rights groups – could sue to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act. This decision will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court – but if it stands, it could gut individual people’s and civil rights groups’ legal right to fight racial discrimination in voting.
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
(THE CONVERSATION) A federal appeals court in Arkansas ruled on Monday, Nov. 20, 2023, that only the federal government – not private citizens or civil rights groups – could sue to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act. This decision will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court – but if it stands, it could gut individual people’s and civil rights groups’ legal right to fight racial discrimination in voting.
Who Can Defend Voting Rights? An Appeals Court Ruling Sharply Limiting Lawsuits Looks Likely to Head to the Supreme Court
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas. View Now Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys.
Voting Rights Act: Key Takeaways From ‘Dangerous’ Court Ruling Upending Decades Of Legal Precedent
By Anthony Michael Kreis Afederal appeals court in Arkansas ruled on Monday, Nov. 20, 2023, that only the federal government – not private citizens or civil rights groups – could sue to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act. This decision will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court – but if it stands, it could gut individual people’s and civil rights groups’ legal right to fight racial discrimination in voting.
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
By Anthony Michael Kreis, Assistant Professor of Law, Georgia State University The ruling could make it impossible for groups like the ACLU to file lawsuits to protect people’s right to vote – significantly changing how the Voting Rights Act has been interpreted so far. Read complete article © The Conversation -
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
A federal appeals court in Arkansas ruled on Monday, Nov. 20, 2023, that only the federal government – not private citizens or civil rights groups – could sue to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act. This decision will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court – but if it stands, it could gut individual people’s and civil rights groups’ legal right to fight racial discrimination in voting.
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p 7656C2= 2AA62=D 4@FCE :? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^ac`fabbe\2C<2?D2D\DE2E6\4@?76C6?46\?224A\a_ab\``\a_\gE9\4:C4F:E\@A:?:@?QmpC<2?D2D CF=65k^2m @?
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p 7656C2= 2AA62=D 4@FCE :? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^ac`fabbe\2C<2?D2D\DE2E6\4@?76C6?46\?224A\a_ab\``\a_\gE9\4:C4F:E\@A:?:@?QmpC<2?D2D CF=65k^2m @?
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p 7656C2= 2AA62=D 4@FCE :? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^ac`fabbe\2C<2?D2D\DE2E6\4@?76C6?46\?224A\a_ab\``\a_\gE9\4:C4F:E\@A:?:@?QmpC<2?D2D CF=65k^2m @?
Who can defend voting rights? An appeals court ruling sharply limiting lawsuits looks likely to head to the Supreme Court
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) kAmW%wt r~}'t#$p%x~}X p 7656C2= 2AA62=D 4@FCE :? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]5@4F>6?E4=@F5]@C8^5@4F>6?ED^ac`fabbe\2C<2?D2D\DE2E6\4@?76C6?46\?224A\a_ab\``\a_\gE9\4:C4F:E\@A:?:@?QmpC<2?D2D CF=65k^2m @?
Smoking Out The Kush (feat. Prof. Anthony Michael Kreis) on Apple Podcasts
Friday, September 1st, 2023 Today, in the Hot Notes: the first Proud Boys’ sentences come in at HALF the recommended time by sentencing guidelines; representative Jamie Raskin asks Rep Comer to subpoena Jared Kushner after failed attempts to retrieve documents regarding his $2B Saudi payout; several filings are made in Fulton County about the speedy trial considerations and removal of Meadows’ case to federal court; the jury in 1/6 fugitive Brandon Fellows’ case reaches a guilty verdict after...
Racketeering & other felonies of Trump
Eighteen of Trump’s allies and associates, including former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, were also indicted for racketeering and other felony charges for their alleged involvement in the scheme. This marks Trump’s fourth indictment in five months – and the second to come from his efforts to undo the election results that awarded the presidency to Joe Biden. And the punishments for violating the state’s RICO are harsh.
Georgia Charges Trump With Racketeering
Why you can trust us An Atlanta, Georgia, grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump on Aug. 14, 2023, charging him with racketeering and 12 other felonies related to his alleged attempts to overturn his 2020 election defeat in the state. Eighteen of Trump’s allies and associates, including former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, were also indicted for racketeering and other felony charges for their alleged involvement in the scheme.
The Historic Significance of Indicting Trump: Protecting Democracy and the Constitutional Order
Title: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ Indictment of Trump Signals a Critical Moment for Democracy Subtitle: Understanding the Historical Context and Importance of the Prosecution By Anthony Michael Kreis With the recent indictment of former President Donald Trump and several co-conspirators by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the stage is now set for a significant legal battle. However, it is crucial to recognize that the case’s significance extends beyond the courtroom.
With the Latest Trump Indictment, Mind These Lessons From the South - The New York Times
Opinion|Georgia Indictment Lessons From the South’s History of Democratic Decay https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/opinion/trump-indictment-georgia-history.html Guest Essay Aug. 15, 2023, 7:00 p.m. ET Credit...Illustration by Shoshana Schultz/The New York Times By Anthony Michael Kreis Mr. Kreis is an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University. Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning.
5 Key Things to Know About the Fulton Trump Indictment
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas. View Now Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys.
Fulton County charges Donald Trump with racketeering, other felonies -- a Georgia election law expert explains 5 key things to know
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in. Check your email for details. An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account. CAPTCHA Send Email × × Secure & Encrypted What's your email address? Who is this gift for? Optional message for the recipient Who is this gift from? Delivery date What's your billing location?
Fulton County charges Donald Trump with racketeering, other felonies -- a Georgia election law expert explains 5 key things to know
Licenced as Creative Commons - attribution, no derivatives. Articles Images Videos Commented
Donald Trump charged with racketeering, a favorite tool for prosecutors Original
1/3 Former President Donald Trump faces his fourth criminal case, this time in Fulton County, Ga. Photo by Tannen Maury/UPI | License Photo Aug. 15 (UPI) -- An Atlanta grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump on Monday, charging him with racketeering and 12 other felonies related to his alleged attempts to overturn his 2020 election defeat in the state.
Fulton County charges Donald Trump with racketeering, other felonies - a Georgia election law expert explains 5 key things to know
An Atlanta, Georgia, grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump on Aug. 14, 2023, charging him with racketeering and 12 other felonies related to his alleged attempts to overturn his 2020 election defeat in the state. Eighteen of Trump's allies and associates, including former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani and former White House chief of staff [...]
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Anthony Michael
Contact Anthony Michael, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack