Kevin Cahill on Muck Rack

Kevin Cahill

As seen in: Medium, HuffPost, The Guardian, The London Standard, Archives of Disease in Childhood, MDPI, BLS Publication, Irish Independent, The New England Journal of Medicine, Computer Weekly and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Kevin

Contact Kevin, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Why Highly Specialized Experts May Risk Exclusion at Trial, Law360

|
By Evan Weisberg, Christopher J. Cunio, Kevin Cahill
| hunton.com
By Evan Weisberg and Christopher Cunio of Hunton and Kevin Cahill of FTI Consulting Inc. In In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation,[1] decided by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona in March, the defendants sought to use a medical expert to opine on causation and diagnosis.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

5 Key Questions Attys Should Ask About Statistical Analyses

|
By Katrina Schydlower, Christopher J. Cunio, Kevin Cahill
| Law360 Verified
By Katrina Schydlower, Christopher Cunio and Kevin Cahill · April 15, 2026, 5:28 PM EDT Vetting the reliability of an expert opinion was at the forefront of a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit oral argument on March 9, where the panel questioned whether... To view the full article, register now.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

5 Key Questions Attys Should Ask About Statistical Analyses

|
By Christopher J. Cunio, Kevin Cahill, Katrina Schydlower
| Law360 Verified
By Katrina Schydlower, Christopher Cunio and Kevin Cahill ( April 15, 2026, 5:28 PM EDT) -- Vetting the reliability of an expert opinion was at the forefront of a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit oral argument on March 9, where the panel questioned whether criticisms of the plaintiffs' damages experts went to the admissibility or merely the weight of their testimony.[1]... Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (259) Issue with article?
See all 101 licensed articles (114 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified